(not so firm)
Chick-Fil-A steps up to the mike and loudly and unequivocally says, “Well, uh, I’ll get back to you on that.”
OK, you have a choice: More money or speak out against gay marriage. Can you say “backstroke”? Ya gotta love this carousel of nothingness!
HERE IT COMES!
(How do those sandwiches taste now? They taste the same to me!)
Posts
4 comments:
Follow the money.
If you said it even if it's wrong stand by it. Please don't waffle on an issue like this because you come across as insincere (recant.) I'm so happy I don't eat Chick-fil-lay because I'm a vegetarian :) Now all I need is for a verbal dilimma by the founders of Subway to erupt. If it did I would still eat there. What good is a boycott?
Wasn't this the right thing to do? Wasn't it unchristian to be supporting right wing Republican "moral values" groups in the first place?
I believe this was the right decision...A Christian run business SHOULD not alienate gay customers, gay employees. And if it chooses to donate money, it should go to things like missionary organizations and helping the poor. Family values groups will NOT impact or help redeem the gay community with their methods and modes of thought. If anything they've made things worse.
The gay community needs the love of Christ, not marriage laws.
My post was to point out the hollowness of boycots.
Post a Comment