Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Where is Jesus and His Church?

There are two words that are related. In fact, they are Siamese twins and one without the other is a fraud, or in the metaphor of the New Testament, without each other they are dead. These words are orthodoxy and orthopraxy. The word orthodoxy defines what we believe, and the word orthopraxy defines how we live and act. In short, they outline faith and works.
The relationship between these two components of what we call Christianity must be understood and addressed and respected. Any imbalance runs the risk of a mischaracterization of truth and in fact a mischaracterization of Jesus Himself. The more significant the imbalance results in the greater mischaracterization until eventually there is an actual deception. The imbalance can reach a point where the deception is so profound that redemption is no longer possible within that framework. So let us examine both twins more deeply so we can accurately understand and implement both orthodoxy and orthopraxy in their intended symbiotic relationship.
Orthodoxy is usually defined as Biblical truth that has been understood and taught within the mainstream of the evangelical church throughout history. Now there are wide and varied interpretations of these truths raging from free will to no free will and from all sorts of ecclesiastical structures and practices. To say that the interpretations of Biblical truths have been expressed through many different ways and understandings is to severely understate the width of those parameters. Just look at all the different denominations and sects within Christianity and you can see just how pervasive are the differing perspectives of Scriptural truth.
Many denominations and doctrinal perspectives even argue and debate the most meaningless and insignificant aspects of New Testament theology. Arminians, those who espouse the free will of man, have matriculated into nano-doctrinal segments while Calvinists who may agree on 98% of their doctrinal issues will divide over the remaining 2%. It is quite a spectacle and is to this day a detriment to spreading the everlasting gospel to a lost world. The issues around which Christians will create a doctrinal Maginot line are deeply regrettable; especially when you consider the amount of time and energy it drains from the message of redemption through Jesus Christ.
But as unfortunate and counterproductive are these squabbles, there still is a core nucleus of Biblical truth that surrounds the gospel of redemption and which cannot, and must not be compromised.

I do not believe true and authentic Christianity is being practiced to any large extent in the west. Listen and read as professing believers join hands with political parties and issues, and trash people who genuinely need Jesus, but the political agendas take precedent over their redemption. President Obama is now the target of virulent and caustic attacks from people who profess to believe in and follow Jesus Christ. Morality and money are now the Dagons in western evangelicalism and the message of the cross and its eternal redemption has become a page on our doctrinal statements but is nowhere to be found in our actions and prayers.
Millions worship America and bow before her and suggest that the Creator is somehow concerned with preserving whatever they think was worth preserving in the first place. The “Founding Fathers” are heroes even though many were slave owners, promiscuous, and far from anything that can be considered evangelical. The Constitution has become an appendage to the Bible, and the Revolutionary War is considered an orchestration, rather than an incorporation, of God’s will. The American flag is displayed in most church worship centers, and usually pledged allegiance to on the 4th of July weekend. The entire mess is an affront to the gospel.
The list of sinners that are hated continues to grow: illegal aliens, Democrats and Republicans, President Obama or George Bush, the entire gay population, Muslims in general, and anyone else who does not fit within some patriotic and moral parameters regardless of their desperate spiritual need. It no longer is the gospel of Jesus Christ; it is now the gospel of moralism, nationalism, hedonism, or some concoction of all of them. Some desire to dismantle any sort of Biblical truth while the other side parade their systematic theologies as proof of their membership card to the body of Christ. And when asked which people are remarkable and observably different within the western culture most would be hard pressed to identify anyone outside the practicing Amish. Peculiar people? Clothed in humility? Walking in love? You’d have to be a deceived liar to authenticate any of those monikers in America today as it concerns the overwhelming throng of evangelicals. Even the Joel Osteens and Ed Youngs are unashamed hedonistic profiteers.
And then there are the doctrinal idolaters that are consumed with doctrine on paper and are light with living the epistles they so completely articulate. There are legions of books that outline the Greek and Hebrew Scriptures in a systematic way in order to keep the faith tethered to the actual teachings of those Scriptures. And while that is certainly important, it is not enough just to believe the correct doctrine, it must be lived. When Biblical “scholars” say “doctrine” they almost always mean one of the “ologies” such as soteriology or theology. Rarely do they treat humility, love, mercy, patience, or grace as doctrines. Who says "That man is orthodox in his love?" Who says "That man is orthodox in his humility?"
The entire world suffers every single day. Children are beaten and abused and many will starve to death this very day. Mothers watch with blank stares as their child nears the end of his life simply because there is no water or food. Who in God’s dear name is our neighbor? Our street block? Fellow Americans? Of course Jesus was teaching us that our neighbor is everyone in the world. And yet professing believers get all caught up with issues, moral and material, while much of the world lives in darkness and great distress. Christians even whine about being “persecuted” in America which reveals how little they know of real persecution but are fully versed in complaining.
What does a life that reflects Jesus look like in this western hedonistic culture? Is it enough to avoid smoking or cursing or getting drunk? Are the “don’ts” what really defines a life that overtly manifests the Person and character of Jesus Christ? And is the life and power of Jesus Christ so tepid today, and only really unique to the gospel accounts, that His followers so neatly blend in with their cultural surroundings? Is this unremarkable cultural existence a genuine representation of people who openly claim to have Jesus living inside them, and they themselves sacrificially following in the living footsteps of the Eternal God?
Our commission is to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ as a witness to who He is and what He has done. But there are other admonitions that are meant to mold our lives. And I would like to address one main and important aspect of the life of the church. This goes beyond being kind on the grocery line, or letting someone pass you on the street, or even helping your neighbor take out his trash. This element of a believer’s life has been largely lost on the church, and in fact, it continues to be countermanded openly by the teachings and practice of the western church both personally and collectively.
At the center of a life that reflects and models the life of Jesus Christ are the poor. They exist as either an indictment that discredits our claim to follow Christ, or authenticates that very claim. There is something about the poor, the downtrodden, and the rejected that holds a special place in the heart of their Creator. Jesus, in His early ministry, entered Nazareth.

And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and stood up for to read. And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Isaiah. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,
The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,
To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him. And he began to say unto them,
This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.

Why would Jesus identify the poor, the brokenhearted, the captives, the blind, and the bruised as His redemptive targets? Why not just collectively say sinners? Throughout the Scriptures God takes observable notice of the poor and disenfranchised. And even in the early church there was an acknowledgment that caring for the poor was part and parcel of being a follower of Jesus Christ. Jesus refers to the giving of alms to the poor, and even James says “God has chosen the poor rich in faith”. But the lame and embarrassing ministry to the poor by us western believers is a residual effect of a greater deception; it reveals just how far we have strayed from New Testament Christianity. We have concocted a doctrinal fortress that helps us sleep soundly at night knowing our systematic theology is intact, while living, breathing people are suffering greatly with hardly a thought.
While the local assembly builds a monstrous, high tech edifice to enjoy, complete with an obscene amount of debt, they feel quite comfortable with some paltry food pantry that ministers to the handful that can come and get some help. And the overwhelming percentage of money collected will go to the mortgage and the staff salaries and accoutrements. Watch as they pat themselves on their backs if they can claim 10% goes to missions. And if that assembly considers themselves as “orthodox”, their emphasis will be upon proclaiming and protecting that doctrinal orthodoxy and the needs of people will be given little consideration in the yearly budget.
We western believers have changed and overhauled the entire construct of what it means to be followers and imitators of Jesus Christ either individually or collectively. It is infinitely easier to stop smoking and cursing than it is to give sacrificially of our lives and treasures and go without the camp to seek and minister to those who may never place one dime in our coffers. The one hour religious theatre that passes as meeting with and worshiping the Risen Christ is a redundant exercise in making us feel good and preparing us for a soon following meal and perhaps a televised sporting event. The slightest sound system malfunction becomes an irritant to any artificial ambiance.
And while we meet in air conditioned opulence, even in our own communities, many bear the physical and emotional marks of their social condition arrived at by either events beyond their control or the fruits of their own counterproductive labors. Either way, there they are; stretched out and hidden from our physical eyes so they can be addressed much easier with compassionate words rather than inconvenient and “costly” actions. But the glory of our enhanced worship music, and the erudite offerings of our preachers, and just the ambiance of gathering together with others within the walls of artificial lavishness, soothes the soul and uplifts the spirit to go out from there and live the next week as we have the previous one. And the dogs continue to lick the sores of Lazarus beyond the gates of the church’s existence while we build bigger and more expensive places for people to sit a couple hours every week. Perhaps my words seem too radical?
If this is true Christianity then there must be another Bible since this ecclesiastical construct cannot claim any symmetry with what we now call the New Testament. What did the body of Christ do when it was the original Incarnation? Did that Jesus live in opulence and comfort? Did that Jesus seek out the wealthiest people and raise money to provide a meeting place that would fit their accustomed lifestyle? Did that Jesus go weeks on end without ministering to the poorest among the community? And did that Jesus seek to avoid any contact and interaction with the most identifiable sinners in the city? Did that Jesus borrow money from Caesar to build buildings while still claiming access to the One who owns the cattle on a thousand hills? In short, was that Jesus a hypocrite?
Did that Jesus get involved with all sorts of political issues and take either a conservative or a liberal side? Did that Jesus pledge allegiance to any country or government? Did that Jesus heap up money for Himself? Was that Jesus concerned with eternity or with the things of this world? And did that Jesus spend time with the poorest peasants and the vilest sinners? And so I ask you, which Jesus do we claim to follow?
The proof of orthodox theology can never lie exclusively with any systematic extrapolation of the written Scriptures, but there must be the corresponding actions that authenticate what the heart actually believes juxtaposed against what the Scriptures actually teach. Doctrinal orthodoxy without a living epistle that conforms to the living image of Jesus Christ is like a body without blood. And no one can enjoy the luxury of culling out those doctrinal truths from Scripture that do not demand observable evidence such as the Trinity, the Incarnation, the penal substitution, and many others, without also being held accountable to the veracity of those Scriptural truths that demand observable evidence such as love, mercy, humility, and a passion concerning the ministry to the poor and downtrodden.
And against the backdrop of the ultimate compromise of God becoming a man in order to address the needs of His enemies, how deep are we willing to compromise our own personal surroundings in order to be used to meet the needs of others? Are the needs of others given such priority over our own needs and the needs of those with whom we have relationship that we are resolved, and even willing, to forsake our own desires and reasonable objections so as to be a selfless conduit to help the poor without finding some remonstrance which soothes our conscience but leaves the poor just as they are?
No government can either prevent us from doing Christ’s work or enhance that same redemptive labor. We should, and we must, operate in a different and unique kingdom which has no common subset with any earthly government or other organization. God can and does use and incorporate the acts of men, even the acts of unregenerate men, into His sovereign and providential scheme, but without that eternal blueprint we must adhere strictly to what we have been called to do – preach Jesus and live Jesus. We cannot serve two masters. To embrace or assail any particular government is to fight the wrong battle with the wrong weapons against the wrong people. There is little that compare to the compromise that is contained in nationalism.
Millions upon millions of professing believers are more interested in protecting the so called original intent of the country called America than they are protecting and projecting the original intent of the gospel of Jesus Christ. They have become Americans at the expense of being followers of Jesus Christ. It is very tragic, and extremely difficult to see with any objectivism. It is like attempting to view the back of your head without a mirror. Without the help of someone else you cannot see it. And without the help of the Spirit, beginning with a painful and self sacrificing seeking of the truth regardless of what it might reveal, no one can really see what we have become instead of what we should be.
Our salt is tasteless, or hill is flat, and our light is dim. Without a revival we are reduced to sojourning in spiritual obscurity. Have we wandered so far that we cannot return to Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple? Are we so consumed with Babylon that the Spirit has no access to our hearts?

Oh, that You would rend the heavens and that You would come down, that the mountains might quake and flow down at Your presence--As when fire kindles the brushwood and the fire causes the waters to boil--to make Your name known to Your adversaries, that the nations may tremble at Your presence!
When You did terrible things which we did not expect, You came down; the mountains quaked at Your presence. For from of old no one has heard nor perceived by the ear, nor has the eye seen a God besides You, Who works and shows Himself active on behalf of him who earnestly waits for Him.
You meet and spare him who joyfully works righteousness, uprightness, and justice, earnestly remembering You in Your ways. Behold, You were angry, for we sinned; we have long continued in our sins prolonging Your anger. And shall we be saved?
For we have all become like one who is unclean and does not know it or care, and all our fake righteousness is like filthy rags or a polluted garment; we all fade like a leaf, and our iniquities and our self righteousness, like the wind, takes us away from knowing and serving You.
And who calls passionately upon Your name and awakens and bestirs himself to take and keep hold of You? For You have hidden Your face from us and have delivered us into the prison of our own iniquities and religious contentment.
Yet, O Lord, You are our Father; we are the clay, and You our Potter, and we all are the work of Your hand. Do not be exceedingly angry, O Lord, or remember iniquity forever. Behold, consider, we beseech You, we are Your people.
But Your holy cities have become a wilderness; Zion has become a wilderness, Jerusalem a desolation. Our holy and our beautiful house, the gathering where our fathers praised You, is burned with fleshly fire, and all our pleasant and desirable places are in spiritual ruins.
Considering our condition and the hardness of our hearts, will You restrain Yourself, O Lord and not come to our aid? Will You keep silent and not command our deliverance but humble and afflict us exceedingly?
For Your glory and none of ours, we pray ourselves to be broken by Your Spirit and remade after the likeness of the Redeemer Lord. We stand in need of Your awakening touch that crucifies us once again and resurrects us in the power of His glory. And use us, O Lord, to reach those in need and to reveal the Risen Christ in such a way that men must say, “We have never seen it like this.”
Oh, that You would rend the heavens and that You would come down and reveal Jesus in us.

11 comments:

JIBBS said...

Thanks for this, Pastor Rick.

There is a lot to chew on and pray over in this post.

At my church we have been studying the doctrine of evil, or more specifically, the nature of the devil and the ways he operates in the world.

Last week we ended up discussing "submitting to authorities", from the text of Romans 13. The question was raised, "at what point is civil disobedience justified?" The premise was that our government has become lawless and anti-constitutional and therefore, ought to be resisted to some extent. With the exception of 3 of us (out of about 20), the conclusion was that the American Constitution itself was the authority established by God and it is our duty to oppose them.

I can't tell you how SICK it makes me to realize now how many people think like that. It is, to me, a dead faith. Politics has become an idol. Yet I am thankful there were other men in the class who agree with me that EVERY authority, including the PEOPLE in authority, are there because God has put them there, whether they are good or evil. The only time we ought to even consider civil disobedience is in the case where we are forced to obey men or obey God. That's it. Any other view, to me, is carnal.

This leads me to a question I have for you. I am what you might describe as a "Calvinist", although I don't particularly like being identified as such, it helps with clarification of what I generally believe. However, I attend a Baptist church that is only about 20 percent like-minded in their doctrine.

When we had that discussion about submitting to the governing authorities, I defended my position on the basis that we do so because God is sovereign. We ought to obey, first because God commands it, and second, because He is in control. Absolute control. I told them that if they don't view the ENTIRE world, not just the "religious aspects", but also the political sphere, indeed ALL of reality, without viewing reality through the lens of a God who is working all things according to His will, then quite frankly, they are not living by faith.

Most of the men just stared at me like I was from another planet. Some were angry, although for the most part they tried to be polite in their disputing with me.

So, do you think I was off base to emphasize God's providential control over the affairs of men? I truly tried to edify the men in love and not condemnation, but it definitely felt as though they thought I was attacking everything that was sacred to them. I didn't like that feeling of disunity (even though there were a couple others who thought similarly to me).

I desire that we all live by faith and not by sight.

Anonymous said...

To JIBBS:

Let's caution against casting judgment against believers who God has happened to call to the political sphere and also against "holier than thou" apathy, which leads to self-righteous inaction.

Satan's traps are set both ways.

Rick Frueh said...

JIBBS - The exact "formula" for understanding the intersection of God's sovereidnty and the acts of man will always be a mystery this side of heaven. However I do not believe Romans 13 is a carte blanche for the actions of any government or smuggling Bibles or hiding Jews would have been working against the will of God.

My premise is that believers should not be involved in any government, but as the other comment alluded to, I also believe there are godly and Jesus loving believers who disagree with me. One thing we all can agree upon is that America has become an idol and takes up much time and energy form spreading and living the gospel.

Does it ever cross anyone's mind as to why in the most hedonistic and violent society on earth the church functions with no more persecution than some verbal jabs from time to time that usually copncern some moral or political issue and not our exhibition of Jesus Christ?

In the end, we as followers of Christ should be consumed with the everlasting gospel and being a kingdom light in a dark and sinful world. We are only Americans because America says so and in that we should live as godly neighbors and at peace with all men inas much as is possible. But our lives and our speech should be remarkable and distinctive within this anti-christ culture, and withing this evangelical construct that has strayed so significantly from the plain Scriptural designs and commands.

The American Revolution was a revolt about taxes and representation, and even Washington did not desire independence until the battle at Lexington and Concord. I will again offer this challenge: Show me from the New Testament where followers of Jesus Christ are commanded, or even allowed, to take up arms against a totalitarian government, much less start killing over taxes.

And that is one of the main difficulties. American believers view their country as orchestrated by God rather than incorperated by God. God has used the church in America and its particular brand of freedom has allowed for many missionaries. But from 1940 till the present the most colossal growth of any indiginous church has taken place in China where the numbers went from 8 million to approaching 100 million. This took place under an atheitic and communist regime!

We as believers need to rethink who we are, who God is, and whose kingdom we live and move and have our being in. America is no more favored by God than is Egypt, and in some ways the freedoms we "enjoyed" have now captured the church and we have become Babylonians and have forgotten Jerusalem. Metaphorically, God is calling us back to Jerusalem (God and His kingdom) not be taking moral stands and aggressive verbiage, but be bringing our entire lives into conforming to the image of Christ.

If we examine our walk, our verbiage, our finances, and our evangelism, we will see we have a long way to go.

FTR - I am not a Calvinist and sometimes argue strongly against it. However, one of my best friends is a Calvinist and he is one of the godliest men I have ever know. Some Calvinists tend to make loving them difficult because of their doctrinal self righteousness and their constant rehashing of their particular doctrinal bent. I would much rather hear a message at the shepherd's conference that addresses the particular sins and shortcomings of the men attending that draws them to personal repentance instead of "Why I am a Calvinist" that draws cheers and and the men leave with a deeper sense of "we are right and Osteen (or whoever) is wrong".

We all neeed more mirrors than telescopes.

JIBBS said...

Anonymous:

Please forgive me if you interpreted my words as an indictment against any Christian who happens to serve in the political sphere. Certainly that is not my intent. I absolutely believe there are many Christian men and women who can and do work diligently for the glory of God in politics. I myself try to stay as informed as possible and active as possible in my community inasmuch as it falls in the realm of serving God first. I used to be a political junkie, but as I've grown in my faith, I have learned that politics easily turns into an idol.

In what way have I cast judgment against anyone? My approach is simple. I simply say, "hey, this is how I understand this to be." Then I lay it out what I believe the Bible is teaching us. So when someone tells me that the authority the President has over us is only valid so long as he follows the Constitution, I have a REAL problem with that, Scripturally speaking. They are missing the point of what God's word says. Do you see what I mean?

Also, I do not believe in or advocate "Holier than thou apathy" or "self-righteous inaction".

I believe our battle is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers in heavenly realms. Therefore, politics is not the end game in and of itself, but merely a piece of something much bigger. Something only the Gospel itself can battle against.

JIBBS said...

Pastor Rick:

Thanks for your reply.

"The exact "formula" for understanding the intersection of God's sovereidnty and the acts of man will always be a mystery this side of heaven."

I agree. But at the same time it is clear that God is absolutely sovereign and man is accountable to Him for all his actions.

"However I do not believe Romans 13 is a carte blanche for the actions of any government or smuggling Bibles or hiding Jews would have been working against the will of God."

I agree 100%. As Peter and John said in Acts 4:19, we are to obey the authorities so long as they are not forcing us to disobey the direct commandment of God.

"My premise is that believers should not be involved in any government, but as the other comment alluded to, I also believe there are godly and Jesus loving believers who disagree with me. One thing we all can agree upon is that America has become an idol and takes up much time and energy form spreading and living the gospel."

I am one who respectfully disagrees with your premise, but agree with your conclusions.

"Does it ever cross anyone's mind as to why in the most hedonistic and violent society on earth the church functions with no more persecution than some verbal jabs from time to time that usually copncern some moral or political issue and not our exhibition of Jesus Christ?"

While I definitely get the spirit of what you mean, I also believe a large part of "why" is due to the fact that the Christian influence on America is still in effect, therefore, it acts as a restraint on non-Christian behavior. However, I also see these restraints being taken away in a deluge of moral decline and expect persecution to steadily grow in the US. I also wonder if there is a correlation between the rapid degradation of Christian doctrine in America with the shift to a very moralistic "gospel" has anything to do with this transition in moral decay? Substituting moralism for the Cross has ironically led to moral relativism.

"FTR - I am not a Calvinist and sometimes argue strongly against it. However, one of my best friends is a Calvinist and he is one of the godliest men I have ever know. Some Calvinists tend to make loving them difficult because of their doctrinal self righteousness and their constant rehashing of their particular doctrinal bent. I would much rather hear a message at the shepherd's conference that addresses the particular sins and shortcomings of the men attending that draws them to personal repentance instead of "Why I am a Calvinist" that draws cheers and and the men leave with a deeper sense of "we are right and Osteen (or whoever) is wrong"."

I can relate to what you are saying. I can also say the same thing about many truly self-righteous Arminians, though, so it really doesn't profit anything to call names. I believe at my very core that doctrine matters. It matters a lot. So I guess while I agree with you that I prefer to hear and read about "in the trenches" stuff of daily Christian living and sanctification, at the same time I think the doctrinal side is very important as well. And may all things be done in love and humility.

Rick Frueh said...

JIBBS - You are correct. Self righteousness knows no doctrinal boundaries. My point was that some Calvinists project a form of doctrinal epiphany when they come into "the doctrines of grace". It sometimes seems somewhat like the charismatics who make their tongues experience the core of their interaction and not Christ.

The paramount liability of many Arminians today is a watering down of the gospel to accommodate sinners and provide a convenient way to "accept Jesus" that can fit nicely into a western culture without any real sacrifice or distictiveness.

JIBBS said...

Pastor Rick,

I appreciate your criticism and would say it is an accurate portrayal of what commonly happens amongst people who spend years and years under synergistic teaching before coming to an understanding of the monergistic nature of God's grace. I think a key reason why it appears like such an "epiphany" event, as you described it, is because the issues are so foundational to the Christian faith. The gift of tongues is one thing, but understanding the riches and depths of the sovereign grace of God is infinitely greater.

Perhaps there are more than a few misguided Calvinists out there who use the Gospel for nothing more than a debate tool (I've met a few in online forums). But the majority I've met online and all of them I am friends with here at home are the most Christ-centered people I know.

Anyway, like I said, I don't like the labels. I believed what I do now way before I ever heard the name of John Calvin or any other theologian. I was saved at 23 years old and the only thing I read was the Bible for about 3 years. To me, it's just the Gospel. It's all about Christ.

Paul C said...

Rick - thanks for this post. Very important to consider our faith in the practical sense you lay out.

It is interesting that in Timothy, references to doctrine were speaking of a "way of life". In Acts, the disciples continued in the apostles' doctrine which was a "way of life."

This doesn't minimize the teaching aspect, but puts things in perspective.

Something I'm personally wrestling with right now. May God help us.

JIBBS said...

Good point, Paul. "A way of life" which springs from the doctrine. The doctrine tells us "why" and "how". But it also tells us "to". In this, may God conform us all to the image of His Son.

Unknown said...

Thanks for this article, it was fantastic. I was raised in the Baptist church, and felt very uncomfortable with it for many reasons which are mentioned in your post. This might not be the right place to mention it, but I wrote a song about those issues, and posted it to my myspace account (www.myspace.com/cowboyspencermusic). It's called "My Prayer."

Anonymous said...

To dear brother JIBBS: Ironic that I fellowship with folks who took a sharp turn into Calvinism, even reconstructionist calvinism, and are now clearly neo-calvinist; and it is THEY because of Puritan goals and dominionism who have become quite politically active, with a view of justified resistance, and hold that America is a Christian nation which we Christians must "take back."

Your experience is that because of the calvinistic emphasis on the sovereignty of God, you are not idolizing America nor resorting to political means and contentions. My experience is just the opposite: that precisely BECAUSE of calvinistic covenant theology which as a by product tends to preterism and dominionism, and because of its heritage of magisterialism and taking up arms (Cromwell), those who hold to it are less apt to follow Christian non-resistance and more apt to become belligerent and distracted into wordly political fights.

Surely our calvinist brothers and sisters are devoted lovers of the gospel and of Jesus and excel in many fine virtues; and there are many nuances and streams of reformed traditions. Nonetheless, I do not hold to a "reformed" systematic theology and believe that calvinism eventuates in some misunderstandings and blindnesses to God's ultimate purposes in creation, which issues will become more important in the days to come.

So in summary I am saying that holding to calvinism or not does not seem to influence wether one becomes dominionist or politically obsessed or not.

I think you should investigate dominionism, because many who would not claim to be calvinist, like some baptists or the charismatics or the third wavers, are also dominionist. And what they have in common is a general replacement theology about the remnant Israel of God (not to be confused with the secular political state of Israel) and their view of Jesus' return, which justifies their belief that the "Church" should take over and Christianize the world.

I appreciate your thoughtfulness on these issues and your willingness to talk with your church brothers. I think you will find that dominionism, more significantly than calvinism, is what distinguishes you from them, and why some seemed almost angry with you.