Saturday, September 08, 2007

Understanding the
Emergent Movement

Before I expound what I believe is a balanced approach to understanding why the emergent church was birthed and where some are headed, let me run up the flag pole a few disclaimers before the stake is lit and I'm skewered on the end of a pike. There are some within the movement who have slipped over the edge in their attempt to be edgy. Some have slid so far off the cracker that even many emergent teachers who are very expansive in their thinking have come out in correction. Maybe not the “God will boil you and your children and encourage all His children to laugh at your misery” type of correction, but to be fair it was printed correction with some open concern.

I believe the emergent movement began as a reaction to the stagnation and the sometimes shallowness of the evangelical church world. As a generalization you have one side on an ever increasing attempt to be relevant and recreate Christianity into a self help program with a tinge of eternity connected with it, and on the other side you see the battle gear laden warriors that protect the core of Scriptural truth while many neglect the weighty matters of Christlikeness. So fuzzy but friendly verses fundamental but furious. And what do you do when you are faced with that choice? Viola…the emergent movement.

Now in any movement there are excesses no matter how Biblical the intentions. In the great revivals of the past there were always excesses of emotion and sometimes teaching, so if indeed God can use some fresh anointing to break up the fallow ground it would be unreasonable to expect perfection and a seamless transition. The danger being leaving the safety of Scripture and sailing on the waves of subjectivism. Like the great disappointment of 1844 which started with a genuine learning about the Lord’s return but ended with a misguided date setting, so could the emergent movement start with a genuine desire for more of God and end with a subjectivism that deviates from Scripture altogether.

And that deviation is prevalent in some circles of emergent thought, some with overt deviations and others with an ulterior focus on world issues and streams of post modern thinking that render Scripture as a side issue. That direction can only lead to the dissolution of truth as we know it and an entirely new brand of Christianity with no sextant with which to set a course. Excitement and the thirst for new can easily replace the gospel truths and that is the danger that must be faced by the leaders in the movement or it will deceive an entire generation. And using the obvious self righteous viciousness of some of the fundamental crowd as an excuse for Scriptural laziness is of no value.

But understanding the general movement must be sifted through the prism of “why“. Are we so blind that we can be satisfied with criticizing without taking inventory of the overall powerless stagnation of the evangelical and fundamental world? Where are the prayer meetings that are visited by God’s presence in such a way as to elicit a wonder from our children? Where is the forbearing love among us that so demonstrates Christ’s love for His church that the world takes notice of such brotherhood? The orthodox church has fallen in such petrified love with their doctrines of paper, regardless of how true, that we have left the painful journey that seeks to live Christ in a tangible way. Some derive most of their spiritual energy and personal Christianity from the criticism of others.

And the tearless march of the doctrinal soldiers continues to massage each other with the assumed knowledge of Biblical orthodoxy but refusing to include an imitation of Jesus as orthodox. What is truth? Spiritual truth, Biblical truth. Is it just knowledge showcased in a vacuum or must it be presented within a context of faith? When the devil believes and trembles is he in possession of truth or is it just a shadow, a mirage without life?

We know God’s Word is truth, but how can that truth be communicated in a way which retains the power inherent within God’s truth? Is a printed page of the New Testament the same as an anointed preacher of the gospel reciting those same verses? Can God’s truth be presented in drama? Can His truth be presented in song? Can God’s truth be communicated through sign language? Object lessons? Movies? And most intriguing of all, how can God’s truth be presented through the life of a believing follower of Christ?

Now here is the question that has been going through my limited RAM. How do we live the Trinity? How do we live the virgin birth? How do we live justification by faith? How do we live the cardinal doctrines of Scripture? I mean how does your neighbor come up to you and say, “I’ve been watching you for six months and now I believe in baptism.”. We cannot live those doctrines, those things can only be taught by God’s Spirit.

But surely we can allow the life of Jesus to live through us and be used to draw people to ask about the hope that lies within us. Is this what some of the emergent leaders are saying? With some not denying the core truths of Biblical teachings, are they challenging the church to seek to live as Jesus did as a witness for Him and a magnet toward truth? Is there something to a revival of being like Jesus in the church itself? Our lives cannot save anyone, only faith in Christ can, but our lives can be the bucket in which the Spirit brings the message to people who up until they met you didn’t even realize they were thirsty. Have we lost that amid our own little cloistered group or more poignant yet, have we lost Him while being the church?

I find unsettling some of the things I hear from some of the emergent corners, but I find also distasteful the smugness that emanates from some of the fundamental corners. So one group moves away from the truth while others make the truth so unattractively self righteous that the result is basically the same. I believe God’s heart and desire is for the church, the body of Jesus Christ, to not only believe the right things but to display the right things. And all those right things can be summed up with one glorious word - Jesus. I am a believing follower of the Lord Jesus Christ, but I have a thirst to be so much more than I am now. Not just to know Him, not just to pass a doctrinal test, but to have Him so take control of my earthly life so as to project Himself in my mortal members and in my attitudes and in my emotions. Is that not what being a follower of Christ is all about, sharing the glorious gospel of Jesus Christ in the majesty of the message, accentuated by the fresco of our lives?

What we do is what we believe…everything else is religious talk,
of which there is plenty.

8 comments:

Unknown said...

Rick,

Imagine a huge group of people from all backgrounds and creeds... and tradition... try not to think of the idea of the "failed' eucemenicalism where we compromised on "truth" for a false sense of peace.

Now, there are some in the group are just looking what is going on... they have no relationship with Jesus, yet they are given an equal voice... (note though it is more to see from an outside perspective what and how we are perceived both strength and weaknesses) There are some who are very much centered in and fitted on the foundation that is Christ Jesus... there are some who are very liberal, conservative, moderate...

Now, we all agree that Jesus, the Bible, and the "core" values of the Christian faith... yet, be you a liberal lesbian or a conservative Calvinist... you engage in a thoughtful dialog... NOT EXPECTING ANYONE TO JUST AGREE WITH YOU... in fact you expect many to disagree with you... yet they listen...looking for common ground...

Now again there are somethings that are Non-negotiable... these all hold tight to... yet there are those things that we see as style, perspective, tradition, we hold loosely and discuss...

The truth is, if anyone has thoughtfully asked a question... such as "How do I live out the incarnation?" (Which I did a series on) you are entered into the emergent/emerging waters... it is the freedom to ask and discuss... and the understanding that God is big enough to be able to stand up to these question... and faith enough in God to work out the "truth" of those questions.

OK... if that makes no sense... we view this as the "emerging conversation"... I was one to fight it becoming a movement as I saw that was to diminish what God is doing... yet, this discussion is the biblical workings out of 1 Cor 11:19.
"No doubt there have to be differences among you to show which of you have God's approval."

I see that if one is able to talk to the liberal lesbian pastor... and treat them with respect you will go much further in convincing them of error and leading to the truth than if one judges and condemns them and further sets their hearts in error...

In that God can work out of kindness... which is what leads us to repentance...

I see error in the conversation.. but beleive me for every error, there is someone who is in the truth who is in dialog with them to lead them to truth...

I see it as the Unity Jesus prayed for in John 17... a true Unity that unites us all in Jesus.

be blessed,
iggyt

Steve said...

Rick,

GREAT POST!!!

I like your analysis. You point out the good while not denying the bad.

I myself, see the various streams within the emergent/emerging movement and have followed it over the past couple of years.

Some pastors, who would be considered 'emerging', have been used of God in my life FAR more than any 'traditional,' 'fundamentalist' pastors have. That's not to say that one is better than the other mind you. It's just God isn't a fundamentalist, or a Calvinist, or a Dispensationalist, or anything else, and therefore is free to use whoever He wants to reach a culture.

Every Christian contextualizes the gospel to the culture he's seeking to reach. When we choose a language, we're contextualizing. When we choose Hymns or contemporary, we're contextualizing.

Tim Keller, Mark Driscoll, Ed Stetzer, Darrin Patrick, Dr. Gerry Breshears, Dr. Micheal Goheen, all excellent members of the 'emerging' crowd.

Greg Boyd, Brian McLaren, guys to be concerned about within the 'emergent' crowd.

ricki said...

Rick - very well done. We listen to or read others with the intent to find a point of disagreement rather than with the intent of finding something that might benefit us.

Chris L said...

Well done, Rick! It often comes down to balance and (to paraphrase Solomon) "avoiding extremes"...

Anonymous said...

agflpRick...thank you for the fantastic post. I have been on both sides of the 'religious' experience. I've been to the extreme fundamentalist, and to the seeker sensitive church ranks, and have grown tired of both.

I am sure there are good churches on both sides.
I have had the rare pleasure/displeasure, of being a part of the pastoral staff at both kind of churches and have seen more things than many would ever want to see.

Hence my exreme dissatisfaction with 'relglious' people/churches.

I want genuine, passionate, christ centered, non-formulaic, life changing church.

Anonymous said...

So well written!For alot of people I believe their views are about control or lack thereof. They see what they hold dear slipping away and the only thing they can do about it is threaten and name call. Fear is a strange motivator. Satan so loves to see believers divided--could you imagine what it would be like if we all got on the same page? There's nothing that could stand in our way. How do people find it so easy to cast aside Jesus commands of loving God and loving your neighbor in favor of being Theologically correct?

Scott Bailey said...

I enjoyed your post. It is not often within this discussion that someone articulates themselves this way. There is usually a lot of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and then talking about how evil that baby was, so forget him anyways. It can be a little much.

Since you're sort of in the middle then perhaps one of these sidebar graphics is for you:

http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/emergent-sidebar/

Anonymous said...

nice post, rick!